Because your essays are short, and the goal of these papers is to improve upon your ability to make focused arguments in a way that convinces others to accept your conclusion, you should start by explicitly stating your thesis.
For example, an essay from an intro course in philosophy might begin with the claim: Starting an essay this way is generally recognized as good form.
The following is a description of the parts of an 'argumentative' essay, that is, an essay wherein you are, at the very least, trying to convince your reader that your point of view is the point of view they ought to adopt, using an argument/the power of reason.
That is, the goal of your paper is to convince every person that ever reads your paper that your position is the position they should adopt.
Before you can present your argument, you need to identify what your argument is going to be about.
That is, you need to do an exegesis, the second part of every argumentative essay.I will argue that the coherence theory, as advanced by Bradley, allows us to understand facts about the world as true or false based on fallible judgements we make about particular claims such as ‘there is milk in the fridge’.” (Please note that this example isn’t necessarily a ‘good’ one in the sense of being original, engaging, and rigorous, but is rather offered as a ‘good’ example of the basic approach.) NOTE: The grader does not care what your particular thesis/point of view is, or what strategy you use to support that thesis/point of view; but does care that your thesis/point of view and your strategy are clear and easily identifiable.Also, having a thesis statement doesn’t actually get you grades; ultimately, your thesis is nothing more than your opinion, and you don’t get grades for having an opinion – you get grades for providing a position that is supported by a set of reasons, i.e., an argument.Since the essays are short, you will want to be concise about this, perhaps by quoting explicit definitions offered by the philosopher you’re considering, or by a brief explanatory sentence.The second part of your exegesis will focus on the specific aspect(s) of the argument that you’ve chosen to analyze.This step tends to take 1 – 2 paragraphs (though it could be more), and is merely an attempt to set a context for your reader.That is, you describe the overall argument as a means of setting the context for your more detailed analysis.That is, what you’re about to read is a guide to success on every ‘argumentative’ essay assignment you ever write (it is hoped).Please don’t hesitate to ask further questions if you are unsure of something.I will argue that the correspondence theory is insufficient for evaluating claims about the world when our goal is to determine whether they are true or not, rather than what it means for them to be true.I will then focus more precisely on the issue of how the truth of such statements are established, showing that the correspondence theory is useless to us when it comes to verifying the truth or falsity of a claim.