Instead, we consider two factors: The Wikimedia Foundation's associate counsel wrote in January 2011, "Unless you know the criteria involved in creating the list, it is impossible to even gauge the potential of a court finding that it warrants copyright protection.
Instead, we consider two factors: The Wikimedia Foundation's associate counsel wrote in January 2011, "Unless you know the criteria involved in creating the list, it is impossible to even gauge the potential of a court finding that it warrants copyright protection.Tags: Oxbridge Essays TimesCan You Copyright An EssayEssay Of DefinitionEssay Of Vietnam WarEmory Emba EssaysHomework Award Certificate
When we want to copy information from lists and compilations, we have to first figure out if they are protected by copyright.
Copyright in a list may exist in the content of the list or in the way that the content was selected and arranged.
In assessing the nature of the material, we first have to determine if content is subjective ("value judgment") or not.
Sometimes this will be obvious ("best love songs"; "U. Presidents, chronologically by term"), and sometimes it will require evaluating the criteria used by the original creator.
To comply with those laws, we may freely reproduce only works that are either not protected by copyright (whether that's because copyright has expired, or because the material was never eligible for copyright protection) or works released under a suitable free license. (See Idea-expression divide.) Discoveries (facts) are not copyrightable, but compilations often are.
With lists and compilations, we sometimes face challenges in determining whether the material is eligible for copyright and, if so, how we might use it. Copyright doesn't only govern fiction; an historical essay may be as much an original work of authorship as a purely speculative science fiction novel.
After making sure content clears these criteria, it should be checked further against the below.) If the content in the source list is a "value judgment", or if there is plausible reason to believe it may be, we cannot treat it like public domain material.
Rather, we must limit our reproduction of the material just as we do reproduction of other copyrighted content.
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors.
This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community.